What Is Positive Psychology: Science-Backed Well-Being for a Flourishing Life

Shifting from a Weakness Focus to a Strength-Based Approach

Psychological research after World War II was largely focused on psychopathology—what makes life dysfunctional. The question, “What is wrong with people?” has shaped much of psychological thinking and research throughout the 20th century.

While it’s undeniably important—leading to insights into various illnesses and the development of effective treatments—this focus on disease and mental deficits has also limited our understanding.

This resulted in a disproportionate number of studies centered on illness rather than well-being.

Studies have shown a greater than 2:1 ratio of negative to positive subjects in psychological literature from the late 19th century to the year 2000. While it is essential to understand human dysfunction, the overemphasis on pathology left a gap in understanding the positive factors that contribute to a meaningful life.

By centering mainly on what goes wrong, we’ve overlooked the factors that make life truly meaningful and fulfilling.

For instance, during a performance evaluation, an employer may focus solely on why an employee is underperforming, rather than exploring their strengths. In therapy, this could mean only addressing negative cognitive patterns without considering the client’s potential for growth through adversity.

As an example, consider a psychologist who focusses only on the problems that a client experiences. From this perspective, the psychologist may discover that the client thinks negatively about the past and these thoughts have negative consequences on their present actions. The idea behind the weakness focus may seem intuitive: by fixing the weakness, we aim to increase well-being. However, as we will see, this view is far from complete and includes fundamental misconceptions about well-being.

Introduction to Positive Psychology

Traditionally, psychology has focused on relieving human suffering, particularly since World War II. While this focus led to better understanding and treatment of mental health disorders, it is different from flourishing — thriving, not just surviving.

Positive psychology, led by Dr. Martin Seligman in 1998, aims to scientifically study the factors that help individuals and communities flourish. Unlike traditional psychology, which mainly aims to reduce suffering, positive psychology also focuses on enhancing well-being.

PERMA™ Theory of Well-Being

Seligman's PERMA™ theory identifies five key building blocks for well-being:

  1. Positive Emotion: Foster gratitude, savor experiences, and nurture hope and optimism.
  2. Engagement: Experience "flow" by fully immersing yourself in activities.
  3. Relationships: Build strong connections that amplify well-being through joy, love, and empathy.
  4. Meaning: Find purpose through causes larger than yourself (e.g., family, social causes).
  5. Accomplishment: Pursue success and achievement, not just for external rewards, but also for intrinsic satisfaction.

Benefits of Well-Being

Positive well-being has tangible benefits, from better health and stronger relationships to improved work performance and a longer life. Optimism, a core element, is linked to lower anxiety and better physical health.

Applications of Positive Psychology

Positive psychology isn’t just for individuals. Schools, parents, workplaces, therapists, and communities all benefit from the application of its principles:

  • Schools: Teach students to flourish.
  • Workplaces: Boost employee well-being.
  • Communities: Promote civic engagement.

PERMA™ Workshops

Well-being interventions based on PERMA™ are proven to boost optimism and reduce anxiety and depression.

Understanding Positive Psychology and Historical Background

Positive psychology studies positive human functioning to improve the quality of life by focusing on positive subjective experiences, character strengths, and institutions.

The field is built on the humanistic movement of figures like Abraham Maslow, emphasizing well-being and purpose.

Key Concepts and Theories

  • Eudaimonia: Aligns with Aristotle's "good life"—authentic self-expression and meaningful engagement.
  • Character Strengths and Virtues: Seligman and Peterson classified virtues like wisdom, courage, and humanity that universally contribute to well-being.

Flow State

Csikszentmihalyi’s Flow Theory describes a state of full immersion in activities, leading to deep satisfaction.

Enhancing Well-Being Through Positive Psychology

Positive Psychology Interventions (PPIs) include practices like gratitude journaling, acts of kindness, and mindfulness exercises. These interventions are effective in boosting happiness and enhancing overall well-being.

National Happiness Indices

Various countries now assess national well-being through indices like the World Happiness Report, inspired by positive psychology.

Criticisms of Positive Psychology

Despite its successes, positive psychology faces criticism for potential "toxic positivity" and overemphasis on positivity, which can downplay real struggles and context-specific challenges. Further research aims to address these limitations.

Key Takeaways

Positive psychology focuses on strengths and relationships to enhance well-being, promoting a flourishing life. Its ongoing evolution integrates diverse perspectives and addresses its limitations.

References

  1. Steger, Michael F. (2009). "Meaning in Life". In Snyder, C.R.; Lopez, Shane J. (eds.). Oxford Handbook of Positive Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  2. Baumeister, Roy F.; Vohs, Kathleen D. (2002). "The Pursuit of Meaningfulness in Life". In Snyder, C.R.; Lopez, Shane J. (eds.). Handbook of Positive Psychology. Oxford University Press.
  3. Feldman, David B.; Snyder, C. R. (2005). "Hope and the Meaningful Life: Theoretical and Empirical Associations Between Goal–Directed Thinking and Life Meaning". Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology.
  4. Stillman, T.F.; Baumeister, R.F.; Lambert, N.M.; Crescioni, A.W.; Dewall, C.N.; Fincham, F.D. (2009). "Alone and Without Purpose: Life Loses Meaning Following Social Exclusion". Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.
  5. Davis, C.G.; Nolen-Hoeksema, S.; Larson, J. (1998). "Making Sense of Loss and Benefiting from the Experience: Two Construals of Meaning". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
  6. Becker, Ernest (1972). Birth and Death of Meaning: An Interdisciplinary Perspective on the Problem of Man. Free Press of Glencoe.
  7. McAdams, Dan P. (1996). The Stories We Live By: Personal Myths and the Making of the Self. New York: Guilford Press.
  8. Baumeister, Roy F.; Wilson, Brenda (1996). "Life Stories and the Four Need for Meaning". Psychological Inquiry.
  9. Czekierda, Katarzyna; Banik, Anna; Park, Crystal L.; Luszczynska, Aleksandra (2017). "Meaning in Life and Physical Health: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis". Health Psychology Review.
  10. Roepke, Ann Marie; Jayawickreme, Eranda; Riffle, Olivia M. (2014). "Meaning and Health: A Systematic Review". Applied Research in Quality of Life.
  11. Winger, Joseph G.; Adams, Rebecca N.; Mosher, Catherine E. (2016). "Relations of Meaning in Life and Sense of Coherence to Distress in Cancer Patients: A Meta-analysis". Psycho-Oncology.
  12. Jin, Paul (1992). "Ecstasy and Contentment: Subjective Well-being in Australia and China". Journal of Happiness Studies.
  13. Zhao, Jinkai; Wang, Xiangli; Zhou, Xuchu (2021). "Happiness and Meaningfulness: A Meta-analytic Review". Journal of Positive Psychology.
  14. Diener, Ed (2000). "Subjective Well-being: The Science of Happiness and a Proposal for a National Index". American Psychologist.
  15. Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). "Review of the Satisfaction with Life Scale". Psychological Assessment.
  16. Steele, Warren (2005). "The Genetics of Happiness". Behavior Genetics.
  17. Fleeson, W., Malanos, A. B., & Achille, N. M. (2002). "An Intraindividual Process Approach to the Relationship Between Extraversion and Positive Affect: Is Acting Extraverted as "Good" as Being Extraverted?". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
  18. Lyubomirsky, Sonja; King, Laura; Diener, Ed (2005). "The Benefits of Frequent Positive Affect: Does Happiness Lead to Success?". Psychological Bulletin.
  19. Wilson, Timothy D.; Meyers, Jeremy (1998). "Maximizers and Satisficers: The Effects of Optimization on Satisfaction". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
  20. Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly (1997). Finding Flow: The Psychology of Engagement with Everyday Life. Basic Books.
  21. Schwartz, Barry; Ward, Andrew (2002). "Maximizing Versus Satisficing: Happiness is a Matter of Choice". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
  22. Schwartz, Barry (2004). The Paradox of Choice: Why More is Less. HarperCollins.
  23. Kashdan, Todd B.; Biswas-Diener, Robert; King, Laura A. (2008). "Reconsidering Happiness: The Costs of Distinguishing Between Happiness and Meaning in Life". Journal of Positive Psychology.
  24. Gilbert, Daniel (2006). Stumbling on Happiness. Vintage.
  25. Diener, Ed; Suh, Eunkook (1997). "Measuring Quality of Life: Economic, Social, and Subjective Indicators". Social Indicators Research.
  26. Aknin, Lara B.; Norton, Michael I.; Dunn, Elizabeth W. (2009). "Spending Money on Others Promotes Happiness". Science.
  27. Ryan, Richard M.; Deci, Edward L. (2000). "Self-determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-being". American Psychologist.
  28. Diener, Ed; Fujita, Frank (1995). "Resources, Personal Strivings, and Subjective Well-being: A Nomothetic and Idiographic Approach".

Learn More

Did you like it? Help us spread the word!

Read More Psychology Articles

Explore More Psychology Resources