Discrimination in Psychology

1. Discrimination in Learning Theory

1.1 Classical Conditioning

In Pavlovian experiments, stimulus discrimination occurs when the conditioned response (CR) appears only to the conditioned stimulus (CS) and not to similar cues; e.g., a dog salivates to a 1 kHz tone but not 1.2 kHz after differential training (BCcampus Open Publishing).
The Little Albert study illustrates poor discrimination—Albert feared all white, furry objects because training never taught a finer distinction (Verywell Mind).

1.2 Operant Conditioning

In stimulus control, a behavior occurs in the presence of an “S⁺” cue (e.g., teacher at the chalkboard) but not an “S⁻” cue (teacher at desk), demonstrating discriminative learning (California State University, Sacramento).

2. Perceptual Discrimination

Perceptual discrimination is the ability to tell stimuli apart—distinguishing faces, pitches, or textures—which relies on fine-grained sensory coding in visual, auditory, and somatosensory cortices (The Sniper Mind, PMC).
Laboratory tasks such as mnemonic-discrimination tests show that older adults’ perceptual discrimination predicts memory accuracy (PMC).

3. Social Discrimination

3.1 Definition and Components

Social psychologists define discrimination as behavioral bias—actions that disadvantage out-groups—complementing prejudice (affect) and stereotypes (cognition) (Noba).
The APA describes it as “unfair or prejudicial treatment based on characteristics such as race, gender, or age” (美国心理学会).

3.2 Mechanisms

| Process | Illustration | | ------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | In-group favoritism | Employers unconsciously prefer applicants who share their background, creating indirect bias (Time). | | Social categorization & out-group homogeneity | Seeing out-group members as “all the same” fuels stereotyping (Verywell Mind). | | Implicit associations | Split-second IAT tasks reveal automatic prejudices that predict subtle discriminatory acts (Noba). |

3.3 Consequences

Discrimination elevates stress hormones, worsens mental and physical health, and perpetuates inequality in housing, education, and policing (美国心理学会).

Discrimination refers to treating people differently solely based on their group identity.

In psychology, this concept has a clear definition, emphasizing behavioral distinctions, which differentiates it from stereotypes and prejudice.

Stereotypes are more about cognitive schemas, while prejudice is primarily an emotional response.

Discrimination, on the other hand, is the behavioral manifestation of these psychological mechanisms.

Self-Categorization and Discrimination

The emergence of discrimination is closely related to the process of social categorization.

In this process, people tend to classify themselves and others into different groups, forming the concepts of ingroups and outgroups.

This social categorization is widespread and forms the basis of our social identity.

For example, we may identify ourselves as "female," "students," "Black," "White," "Yellow,"or "Americans," "Chinese," and this identity can change depending on the context.

Self-categorization theory suggests that when we classify ourselves as members of a certain group, we tend to evaluate the ingroup more positively to enhance our self-esteem.

This preference for the ingroup can lead to negative views and discriminatory behaviors towards outgroups. For instance, in Henri Tajfel's minimal group paradigm studies, it was found that even arbitrary groupings lead individuals to allocate more resources to their own group while excluding the outgroup.

This type of discrimination based on self-categorization is common in real-life situations. For example, people tend to feel more empathy for those belonging to their own country or culture, while showing indifference or even schadenfreude towards outgroup members.

This also explains why, during wars or conflicts, people can exhibit extreme hostility and cruelty towards opposing groups.

Dehumanization and Discrimination

Dehumanization is an extreme form of discrimination, where certain individuals are not regarded as "human" but rather as animals, machines, or objects. The result of dehumanization is that people feel less guilt when inflicting harm on these groups, as they no longer perceive them as "human."

For example, research by Phillip Atiba Goff et al. found that, on an implicit level, Americans often associate Black people with apes, and this animalistic association can influence sentencing decisions, making Black offenders more likely to receive the death penalty.

Harris and Fiske's neuroimaging studies also showed that when people viewed images of heavily stigmatized groups (such as homeless individuals or drug addicts), the brain regions responsible for social cognition showed little activity, indicating that these individuals were not psychologically perceived as "people" similar to oneself.

Perception of Threat and Discrimination

Another psychological mechanism that leads to discrimination is the perception of threat. When people perceive outgroups as threatening their safety, resources, or culture, they are more likely to exhibit discriminatory behaviors.

Integrated threat theory categorizes intergroup threats into realistic threats (e.g., economic competition) and symbolic threats (e.g., cultural and value differences).

In the case of immigration, the perception of threat is often a driving force for discrimination.

For example, some European countries' rejection of Middle Eastern immigrants stems not only from fear of terrorism but also from significant cultural and value differences, which are seen as threats to local cultural identity.

This symbolic threat perception triggers rejection and discrimination against immigrant groups.

4. Comparing the Three Meanings

| Dimension | Learning/Stimulus | Perceptual | Social | | ------------------ | ------------------------------ | ------------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------------------- | | Focus | Behavior to cues | Sensory acuity | Intergroup behavior | | Measurement | Conditioned response rate | Just-noticeable difference (JND) thresholds | Audit studies, bias scales | | Adaptive Value | Avoids inappropriate responses | Fine-tunes perception | Can foster group cohesion but often harms others |

5. Measuring Discrimination

Signal-detection tasks quantify perceptual discrimination by estimating d′ (sensitivity) (The Sniper Mind).
Generalization gradients plot response strength across similar stimuli to assess learning discrimination (BCcampus Open Publishing).
Implicit Association Tests (IAT) and field audits (e.g., identical résumés with different names) reveal social discrimination in hiring and housing (Noba).

6. Reducing Undesirable Discrimination

| Domain | Strategy | Evidence | | -------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | Learning | Multiple-exemplar training to promote generalization where needed | Improves flexible responding in children with ASD (Learning Behavior Analysis, LLC) | | Perceptual | Perceptual learning protocols (e.g., repeated orientation tasks) sharpen acuity | Shifts neural tuning in visual cortex (PMC) | | Social | Contact interventions, bias-awareness training, structured decision protocols | Reduce hiring bias and prejudice over time (Noba, Time) |

To reduce discrimination, it is essential to understand its roots in social categorization, dehumanization, and perceived threat.

Increasing intergroup contact, promoting cross-group understanding, and fostering cooperation are important ways to reduce discrimination.

For instance, social psychologist Gordon Allport's contact hypothesis suggests that contact between groups under equal conditions can help reduce prejudice and discrimination. Additionally, emphasizing a shared group identity and blurring the boundaries between ingroups and outgroups can also help reduce discriminatory behaviors.

7. Key Takeaways

Discrimination in psychology spans learning, perception, and social behavior; all involve detecting and acting on differences.
In conditioning, it is an adaptive skill; in perception, a neural necessity; in society, it can become an ethical problem.
Robust measurement tools and targeted interventions help scientists and practitioners promote useful discriminations (e.g., distinguishing safe vs. dangerous cues) while mitigating harmful ones (e.g., racial bias).

Learn More

我们致力于打造快乐和幸福平衡，激发积极能量的产品。

阅读心理学文章探索心理学资源